Remember the HMHS Britannic? If not I'm not surprised, very few people have even heard of her. She was the slightly larger sister to the Titanic, a name which is familiar to most, especially after the film by James Cameron. The third ship in the White Star line, the Olympic, had a long career, but the Britannic was sunk in its first year of service -- not quite as spectacularly short as the Titanic's, but still quite short.
Why then is one a tragedy of epic proportions and the other a minor footnote in the annals of World War I? Because every single person was able to get off the Britannic. Now, 30 unfortunate souls in 2 lifeboats did die when their crafts were caught in the propellers, but there were 1036 survivors. They had redesigned the craft so that there were more than enough lifeboats for everyone: 48 lifeboats capable of carrying 75 people each, or 3600 total. They even designed it so that all the lifeboats could be launched from one side of the ship, in case the ship was leaning to one side.
What was the real difference? What made the sinking of the Titanic a tragedy and not merely an accident was the faith that it was "unsinkable". Once the shipbuilders realized that their design could sink, it wasn't too hard to make the ship survivable. They did also add a double hull, a standard in still in use today, but while they work great for icebergs and rocks, torpedoes and mines pretty much ignore them.
This blog is not about history, however, and this is not just an interesting anecdote. We stand at the same juncture, and this time billions of lives are at stake, not thousands. Others will tell you we face a dark future ahead, and to be honest, that is likely to be true. But all that really stands in our way is our faith that our civilization cannot collapse. We still have the capability to make a smooth transition, but it requires people to stop thinking we can keep going as we have.
We all can make the Long Ascent if we choose to.
It'll be a long, hard road, getting from here to there, but we can do it, as long as we have the right perspective and the kind of faith that moves mountains one shovelful at a time.
Friday, September 28, 2012
Wednesday, September 12, 2012
The Death of Tyranny
One year ago today I started this blog. The choice of a date was purely a coincidence. Originally I intended it to use it as an entry in John Michael Greer's contest for short stories depicting a future of declining energy usage. However, I am not much of a fiction writer, but I do love writing essays, and for decades I've been crafting a vision in my head of a possible positive future with greatly reduced resource usage. I've slowly been revealing bits and pieces to you during this past year. Since today is a special day I wanted to share a special piece
Aaron Copland wrote a wonderful piece of music called "A Lincoln Portrait". No matter what you think of his actions, Lincoln did have a powerful way with words. My favorite quote is from the middle of the piece, from the Lincoln-Douglas debates of October 15, 1858:
Neither Lincoln nor Brandon Smith went far enough, though. They can be excused for only facing the most immediate struggles. However, that is not what this blog is about. One of the most important themes Daniel Quinn has in his classic book Ishmael is the story of the Takers and the Leavers. I don't want to go too far into that now, but the Takers are about, as Paul Wheaton so colorfully puts it, "making Mother Nature your personal bitch." The Leavers try to change things as little as possible. What Quinn misses is that there are two antonyms to "take". Not only do you have "take it or leave it", you have "give and take". So in addition to Leavers and Takers, you can have Givers. If you can manage to give back more than you take, there are no limits.
This brings us back to the tyrannical spirit. People are beginning to understand now that ethics does not just apply to how you treat other people. If you just take from Nature without ever giving back, you still have the same tyrannical spirit. IT DOES NOT WORK. IT HAS NEVER WORKED. IT WILL NEVER WORK. The difficulty is that the problems accumulate over generations. Unless you have the correct perspective, you may think it is working, like someone falling out of a building saying "See? I'm not dead!" as he passes every floor. Nature only has so much to give.
I just want to say here that I am saying this not as someone who has won the war over that tyrannical spirit within myself, over even as one who wins more battles than he loses. I just know that it is a fight that needs to be fought, and while I may frequently need to pick my battles, I always keep fighting.
Victor Hugo said, "There is nothing so powerful as an idea whose time has come." I say there is nothing so dangerous as an idea whose time is about to pass. It is time for the very idea of tyranny to die. The thought that you can get something without giving something back must be extinguished. And it will be, whether it takes the deaths of 7 people or 7 billion. Like drawing money out of a bank account, if you take it out faster than you earn interest, it doesn't matter how large it was to begin with, eventually you must go broke. Nor does it matter how many #10 cans you store or how many cases of ammo you cache.
So what is the opposite of tyranny? Husbandry. From the bacteria in our guts and the fungi on our skin to the food webs in the rain forests and the oceans, we must care for all forms of life, helping them so that they may in turn help us. This is the only way we can survive. This is the way we will thrive. This is the Long Ascent.
Aaron Copland wrote a wonderful piece of music called "A Lincoln Portrait". No matter what you think of his actions, Lincoln did have a powerful way with words. My favorite quote is from the middle of the piece, from the Lincoln-Douglas debates of October 15, 1858:
When standing erect he was six feet four inches tall, and this is what he said.Brandon Smith wrote an excellent article a couple weeks back on Alt-Market entitled "How to Defeat Tyranny". Very importantly, he did not entitle it "How to Defeat a Tyrant". That is fairly easy. We have witnessed it at least twice in the past decade, in Iraq and Libya. But if you just get rid of one man another will frequently take his place. (My apologies to any other female dictators out there, but tyrants do tend to generally be men.) What Brandon talks about is defeating the spirit of tyranny. As such it is very much a spiritual striving, a crusade or jihad in the best senses of the words. As Lincoln said, if you want to force anyone to do your bidding so that you may benefit at his or her expense, you have a tyrannical spirit inside yourself.
He said: "It is the eternal struggle between two principles, right and wrong, throughout the world. It is the same spirit that says 'you toil and work and earn bread, and I'll eat it.' No matter in what shape it comes, whether from the mouth of a king who seeks to bestride the people of his own nation, and live by the fruit of their labor, or from one race of men as an apology for enslaving another race, it is the same tyrannical principle.
Neither Lincoln nor Brandon Smith went far enough, though. They can be excused for only facing the most immediate struggles. However, that is not what this blog is about. One of the most important themes Daniel Quinn has in his classic book Ishmael is the story of the Takers and the Leavers. I don't want to go too far into that now, but the Takers are about, as Paul Wheaton so colorfully puts it, "making Mother Nature your personal bitch." The Leavers try to change things as little as possible. What Quinn misses is that there are two antonyms to "take". Not only do you have "take it or leave it", you have "give and take". So in addition to Leavers and Takers, you can have Givers. If you can manage to give back more than you take, there are no limits.
This brings us back to the tyrannical spirit. People are beginning to understand now that ethics does not just apply to how you treat other people. If you just take from Nature without ever giving back, you still have the same tyrannical spirit. IT DOES NOT WORK. IT HAS NEVER WORKED. IT WILL NEVER WORK. The difficulty is that the problems accumulate over generations. Unless you have the correct perspective, you may think it is working, like someone falling out of a building saying "See? I'm not dead!" as he passes every floor. Nature only has so much to give.
I just want to say here that I am saying this not as someone who has won the war over that tyrannical spirit within myself, over even as one who wins more battles than he loses. I just know that it is a fight that needs to be fought, and while I may frequently need to pick my battles, I always keep fighting.
Victor Hugo said, "There is nothing so powerful as an idea whose time has come." I say there is nothing so dangerous as an idea whose time is about to pass. It is time for the very idea of tyranny to die. The thought that you can get something without giving something back must be extinguished. And it will be, whether it takes the deaths of 7 people or 7 billion. Like drawing money out of a bank account, if you take it out faster than you earn interest, it doesn't matter how large it was to begin with, eventually you must go broke. Nor does it matter how many #10 cans you store or how many cases of ammo you cache.
So what is the opposite of tyranny? Husbandry. From the bacteria in our guts and the fungi on our skin to the food webs in the rain forests and the oceans, we must care for all forms of life, helping them so that they may in turn help us. This is the only way we can survive. This is the way we will thrive. This is the Long Ascent.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)